frozenveg wrote: Thanks, Jeff, for this additional information. (I like to hear good news about my
good habits!)

It seems like there is a form of nutritional elitism going on, which is really doing more harm then good. The message is, if the food you eat is not fresh picked organic, local, shady grown, GMO-free, that you picked your self, got at a local farmers market or from some elite health food store, and all blended together in a $500 hi-tech blender, you are not doing any good. And, if you buy any frozen of canned foods, let alone from Walmart, you might as well be eating bacon cheese burgers.
Not to long ago, someone challenged me, asking what I would eat on the local boardwalk by the beach (as I have said I like to spend lots of time there). My response was that I almost always bring my own food but I could easily find something to eat. So, I went there to find dinner and our boardwalk does not feature the fanciest restaurants, mostly pizza places, pubs, seafood shacks, etc. I ended up at an open air pub/restaurant right on the beach (known as a "biker bar") and ordered dinner.I got to sit outside on the boardwalk, 15 feet from the beach, right by the water, next to an open air stage that was featuring a jazz band. I ordered a large garden salad with some balsamic vinegar, a side of fresh steamed corn, a side of fresh steamed broccoli and a fresh baked dry large potato. It was beautiful and filling and cost me no more than $10. I posted the pics and you would not believe the amount of viscous criticism the picture received. Was the corn organic? Was the broccoli organic? Was the corn GMO-free? Was the potato organic? Why was the potato wrapped in aluminum foil? etc etc etc Because of the amount of criticism, I eventually took the picture down. I guess it was just not good enough for most of the people posting and since a 100% organic, GMO-free meal, made without aluminum foil was not available, I should have had the fried shrimp platter, the bacon cheese burger, or the lobster feast. Or maybe the vegan lasagna stuffed full of vegan cheese and soy meat substitutes loaded with salt and fat, or maybe the organic, free-range, wild buffalo steak.

Here is the pic...

frozenveg wrote: Can I ask a simplistic question (it's probably been asked before)? I talk to folks who try to minimize the importance of eating vegetables because of our poor soil, lost nutrients after picking and processing, blah, blah, blah. So they rely on taking vitamins, and are appalled that I take nothing but B-12 now!
Can I at least make this point with them (I am asking if it's accurate): If it is a fact that some nutrients are lost after picking and processing, then we should eat more of the vegetables, which would then give us the amount of nutrients we need. It seems incredibly simple to me, but is it that simple?
Yes, we have covered it in several threads, which I don't have access to this minute but they are in the forum.
Basically, it is not true.
There is always nutrient variance, sometimes even a significant amount, even amongst the same apples grown on the same tree, picked at the same time. Even when you go to the USDA Nutrition Database SR 26, which is the standard for nutrient analysis values, there is no one value for any nutrient in a food, it is an average of a dozen or so samples. So, nutrient variance alone is not the issue.
Even if it was true, it does not matter if the tomatoes grown today have a little less nutrients then the tomatoes grown yesterday. What matters is, does the total nutrient content of the total diet you eat today provide enough nutrients to meet all your needs. And, As I have shown many times by doing the analysis of food grown today, if you follow our recommended guidelines, it easily does.
The real reason why people consume nutrient poor diets has nothing to do with the soil today, but because over 65% of their diet comes from ultra processed and refined foods. The solution is not supplements, but switching to a whole food, plant based, low SOS diet.
Also, remember, more is not always better. Deficiencies are bad and so getting enough and an adequate amount is good & beneficial, but I can't think of any one area in nutrition where more is better once we have hit adequate/enough/sufficient levels.
In Health
Jeff