Moderators: JeffN, f1jim, John McDougall, carolve, Heather McDougall
Mrs. Doodlepunk wrote:I wonder what the ideal fat percentage is for trolls?
SactoBob wrote:
Good question - but only if we are going to feed him. IMO, best to just ignore these posts. The guy can't believe anybody takes him seriously here.
Lacey wrote:r-marie wrote:So, considering that there is a metabolic theory (protein types, carbohydrat types and mixed) that some of us do better adding a little animal food which was true for me.
As far as I have been able to tell there us not one drop of SCIENCE to support the notion that there are different metabolic types.
auntemmy wrote:Lacey wrote:r-marie wrote:So, considering that there is a metabolic theory (protein types, carbohydrat types and mixed) that some of us do better adding a little animal food which was true for me.
As far as I have been able to tell there us not one drop of SCIENCE to support the notion that there are different metabolic types.
Evidence or not, one just needs to look around to see the obvious metabolic differences in people. IMO.
Zoomer wrote:
Heretic is free to continue to waste his time posting here but we certainly don't have to waste ours by reading or answering his posts. In fact I think its a disservice to Dr McDougall and his forum.
judynew wrote:I joined this forum yesterday and find myself immediately reading this thread and wondering.
There was a documentary on TV a few months ago about a man doing research with First Nations people in northern British Columbia who had fallen into a junk food diet and were suffering extreme health problems. After they were put back on their traditional diet, which included buckets of oil obtained from a particular fish, they all made great improvements. Unfortunately I only saw part of it and can't remember any of the details.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." It isn't necessary for us all to agree.
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 0 guests