Moderators: JeffN, f1jim, carolve, Heather McDougall
Zoey wrote:No change for me this week. Next time I start whining about being in the pound-a-week club, I'll remember this!
I did fine this week other than one extremely damaging afternoon/evening. We got Chinese take-out, and asked for steamed rice instead of fried rice, like we always do. Well, they forgot, and instead of swapping them out, they just gave us the steamed rice in addition. Which meant there was fried rice in the house, noooo! I only had a few bites, but still...
Then later I said, well, just one glass of wine won't hurt.
And it won't.
It's everything that comes after it, like the second glass, and the cashews and pistachios.
I was not happy with the bloating the next day, so I just took it as a good reminder as to why I need to abstain. I just wish I could get the lovely taste of wine without the loss of inhibitions. But I haven't found it yet, so oh well.
Enough about the one bad day. I'm happy that I seem to have my fruit intake under control, so yay! I'm not mindlessly eating it for thirst or boredom or whatever. I'm waiting until I'm truly hungry. I mean, there is no fruit that I couldn't devour right now, and I'm not the least bit hungry. So now I have a handle on it. It is not a 'free' food, it is actual food that counts, so I'm making it count for me instead of against me.
Thank you all so much for the tips and the inspiration!
Lakegirl wrote:Wild goose: Thanks so much for your input! I will try steaming Hannahs and JSPs this week before using them to make fries. Sounds so good!
AnnetteW wrote:
OMG, this is me to a T. Not having things in the house in the first place is most important. I absolutely can not have wine in the house. Nuts at minimum need to be frozen and hidden in the back. (Note to self, hide that full bag of walnuts, hide it well). And of course the Chinese food sodium content sticks around for days. And fruit, summer fruit is so divine, I too have had a little too much, but I'm not stressing over a little fruit.
Hang in there, get past those things, and move forward.
That feels significant and is a valuable insight to extract from this week's obstacles. I imagine you have seen these already, but here are Jeff's resources and basic principles for Dining Out, in case you're faced with a similar situation in the future.squealcat wrote:Most of the MWL points were a problem for me the past 3 days. I realize that I must learn to not turn my back on those in the future. If this is my life now, I need to see this way of eating as an easy way to eat even when life changes very quickly around and I suddenly am in the dark with no power.
That's exactly why I continue to harp on it! Seriously, good for you turning a challenging week into an important lesson - it seems to me those subjective learning experiences are absolutely part of the process. Thanks for the potato recipe - YUMMM!carwex wrote:I realize now that my problem was that I was not paying attention to the MWL- AS IT IS WRITTEN. When I re-read the 10 principles I saw that except for #3 and #8 I really did not adhere to the rest of the principles.
This underlies what Mark is always harping on- Rather than worrying about the weight loss., we need to direct our attention to the appropriate food behaviours outlined in the 10 principles. Losing weight is the result of adhering to these principles.
This has been a learning experience.
JeffN wrote:I would argue that the set point theory may exist but not as commonly believed. That our weight is not the result of a certain predetermined number that our body fights to maintain but that our weight is the result of our maintaining an environment and a certain set of behaviors (diet, activity, etc) in a "zone" that we are most comfortable with. If we change these behaviors (the difficult part), we change the resulting weight and/or set point. Granted, this is not easy, but can be done. So, the question is, are we returning to a certain number/weight, or are we returning to a certain set of behaviors that result in that weight?
Did everyone's set point rise dramatically in the last 25 years? Or is this the result of a change in the environment and the behaviors related to energy balance including an increase in the availability of inexpensive calorie dense food, and a environment that encourages a sedentary lifestyle?
I found Jeff's response to the following question very instructive; I think it is quite applicable in considering the behavior change approach to weight loss vs. "dieting."JeffN wrote:The Starvation Mode, Slowed Metabolism & The Set Point Theory
viewtopic.php?t=11464
viewtopic.php?t=8824
viewtopic.php?t=7419
viewtopic.php?t=17541
viewtopic.php?f=22&t=9808..
This is the newest and was a response to the fairly recent headlines from the Biggest Loser show.
viewtopic.php?f=22&t=51953
slugmom wrote:If it's really just all about the calories, why NOT try to eat as little as possible to lose weight faster?
And this post would seem to be apropos, given our recent discussions around snacking and fruit.JeffN wrote:Because only the "weight" is about energy balance/calories. There are still other concerns we need to deal with including hunger, satiety, nutrient intake, bone density, muscle tissue, etc.
So, yes, in regard to weight, it is just all about the calories. But health is not about just weight and that is why I would not recommend an approach such as just eat as little as possible, that just focuses on and tries to solve the weight issue ASAP.
slugmom wrote:So ... if optimizing weight loss is my goal ... and I'm legitimately hungry, or really munchy and want a snack ... which would be better? Popcorn? Fruit?
And why calorie counting is ineffective.JeffN wrote:IMH(P&P)O, and based on calorie density, of the two, I would say fruit. However, vegetables would be a better choice and/or a meal of 50% starch and 50% vegetables (and/or fruit) by volume. A meal of 50% starch and 50% vegetables by volume would have a very low calorie density. So, a bowl of 50% oatmeal and 50% berries by volume or a bowl of 50% rice and 50% veggies by volume may be the better choice. You get the starch to help satisfy you and the fruit and/or veggies to help lower the calorie density.
It seems clear to me that the answer to this type of question (and many others), is best presented by the MWL 10-Point Checklist. If you are adhering to the checklist and practicing the recommended behaviors, you are (I think quite literally) doing everything you can do to lose weight in a healthy, sustainable way. If it feels helpful to approach things from the opposite direction, one could also review these 9 reasons you may be struggling.JeffN wrote:In the end, calories will always "count" but the problems is just "counting" calories is ineffective because 1) we have very poor tools that are highly inaccurate to count calories with, 2) it eventually and almost always leads to portion control, which leads to hunger, which leads to binging, 3) there are many other factors that may influence the daily fluctuations in weight that we have no way to control for (fluid balance, etc), Even fecal content of the bowels can cause a weight change of several pounds when eliminated if elimination is not regular.
There is just no way to micro manage all these details on a daily basis and that is why trying to micro-manage energy balance on a daily basis is virtually impossible. Some days it will not make any sense and some days it may make too much sense.
This is why calorie density is the much better approach. MWL is based on calorie density. However, the MWL does not recommend living on just starches and gives recommendations for those who are finding the basic recommendations not enough for them to lose weight. We are all individuals and may have different levels of activity, exercise, NEAT, etc. and have to make adjustments accordingly. I reviewed some of these in a recent thread. One of the main recommendations is to increase the volume of vegetables in all your starch based meals to 1/3 to 1/2 of the volume of the plate/bowl.
JeffN wrote:Iif you are looking to fine tune your program or wondering why you may be struggling or not seeing the results you would like to as quickly as you would like, you may want to review these points.
I have updated them and added in a few new ones.
1) Poor Adherence/compliance. Sometimes from lack of application and sometimes from lack of understanding of the principles.
2) Misdirection of focus/priorities. Focusing on matters that don't really effect your health while not focusing on the ones that do.
3) Minimizing/Rationalizing the effect of certain behaviors and/or personal preferences, **especially in regard to certain foods**.
4) Too many processed/refined and/or calorie dense foods, especially those that are marketing as being "healthy."
5) Not understanding the difference between something that is "allowed" on occasion in small quantities, and something that is "recommended."
6) Inadequate exercise/activity
7) Not planning ahead. If you do not plan ahead for success, you will most likely not find it.
8 ) Time. Healing and results take time and for some of us, it may take a little longer than we hope.
9) Mcdougall "Plus" - This is where you mix the principles taught here with other principles you have read or learned somewhere else that are in conflict with the principles recommended here. While there are some program that are very much inline with these principles (ie, Esselstyn, etc) most are not.
JeffN wrote:But what is more important and what I feel to be the most important test, is what I call the "plate test." Very few people know about it yet it is one of the most effective tests and simple and easy to do and very inexpensive. You can even do it at home.
Here is how you do it.
When you sit down to eat each meal, look at your "plate" and see if it passes this "test", the "Plate Test."
Are at least 95% of the calories on your plate coming from unrefined unprocessed fruits, vegetables, starchy vegetables, intact whole grains and/or legumes? Are there at least 12-15 grams of fiber coming from whole natural foods? Does it meet my guidelines for sodium? Are any "exceptions" being kept to less than 5% of calories?
If your meal passes this "Plate Test", then I think that is the most effective test you can ever have done and the best indicator of your future health and longevity.
Wildgoose
@Lakegirl Remember to chill those potatoes after steaming. I usually do a batch of potatoes, put them in the fridge overnight, and start using them for fries the next day. It doesn’t work nearly as well with freshly steamed potatoes. The chilling is the secret.
Goose
Return to Maximum Weight Loss Program
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 0 guests